Dr. Helen Landmann

@article{Landmann2023,

title = {Key experiences of volunteers in refugee aid},

author = {Helen Landmann and Birte Siem and Birgit Fuchs and Anette Rohmann},

url = {http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Landmann-et-al-2023-Key-Experiences-1.pdf},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2023.2238635},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-07-31},

urldate = {2023-07-31},

journal = {Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies},

abstract = {To investigate the specific events and processes that contribute to volunteering in refugee aid, we conducted a qualitative study with volunteers in Germany (N = 220). Participants described in their own words critical incidents that motivated them to volunteer. Content analysis revealed contact with refugees (spatial closeness or conversation), contact with non-refugees (volunteers or xenophobic persons), media experiences (reports about refugees or calls for action), and biographical incidents (own migration or major life changes) as key experiences. The results provide valuable insights into experiences that motivate people to volunteer in refugee aid, which supports integration processes of refugees and asylum-seekers.},

keywords = {collective action, contact between groups, Emotion, empathy, prejudice, refugee migration, volunteering},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann0000b,

title = {Being positively moved by climate protest predicts peaceful collective action},

author = {Helen Landmann and Jascha Naumann},

url = {http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Landmann-Naumann-2023-Being-Moved-by-Fridays-for-Future.pdf},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-07-12},

urldate = {2023-07-12},

journal = {Global Environmental Psychology},

keywords = {being moved, collective action, Emotion, pro-environmental behavior},

pubstate = {forthcoming},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Barbett0000,

title = {What is pro-environmental behaviour? Towards nuanced maps of multi-dimensional pro-environmental behaviours that highlight the relevance of impact and diversity},

author = {Lea Barbett and Helen Landmann},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-07-11},

journal = {Umweltpsychologie},

keywords = {diversity, Environment, pro-environmental behavior},

pubstate = {forthcoming},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Assessing Diversity Dimensions in Environmental Psychology: Challenges and Recommendations},

author = {Helen Landmann and Sven Kachel and Laura Kommerscheidt and Florian Lange and Isabel Richter},

url = {http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Landmann_Kachel_Kommerscheidt_Lange_Richter_2023_Assessing_Diversity_Dimensions.pdf},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-06-10},

urldate = {2023-06-10},

journal = {Umweltpsychologie},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {forthcoming},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2023context,

title = {Context Matters - Social Context Moderates the Association Between Indirect Intergroup Contact and Attitudes Toward Refugees},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann and Robert Gaschler and Stephan Weissinger and Agostino Mazziotta},

url = {https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/full/10.1027/1864-9335/a000505},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000505},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-11-01},

urldate = {2022-11-01},

journal = {Social Psychology},

volume = {53},

issue = {6},

pages = {341-356},

publisher = {Hogrefe Publishing},

abstract = {Based on an integration of socioecological systems and intergroup contact theory, we hypothesized that the context in which intergroup contact takes place moderates its association with attitudes toward refugees. To test this prediction, majority members in Germany reported in three studies (Ntotal = 695) how often they have had positive and negative direct and indirect contact with refugees in different contexts and their attitudes toward refugees. While the association between direct contact and intergroup attitudes was relatively context-independent, the association between indirect contact and attitudes toward refugees strongly depended on context. Indirect contact was more strongly associated with attitudes toward refugees in contexts with close relationships (family and friends) than in contexts with distanced relationships (newspaper and TV).},

keywords = {contact between groups, context, refugee migration},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Bick0000,

title = {Social Evaluation at a Distance - Facets of Stereotype Content about Student Groups in Higher Distance Education},

author = {Nathalie Bick and Laura Fröhlich and Marie-Therese Friehs and Patrick Kotzur and Helen Landmann},

doi = {https://osf.io/mjf5n/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-01},

urldate = {2022-09-01},

journal = {International Review of Social Psychology},

volume = {53},

issue = {1},

abstract = {In the academic domain, belonging to a negatively stereotyped group can impair performance and peer relationships. In higher distance education, stereotypes may be particularly influential as face-to-face contact is limited and non-traditional students who are at risk of being stereotyped are overrepresented. Still, research on stereotypes in higher distance education is sparse. The current research addresses this gap by investigating the Big Two of social perception (warmth, competence) and subordinate facets (friendliness, morality, assertiveness, ability, conscientiousness) in the context of higher distance education. It tests a) how well models with warmth/competence or the facets fit the data, b) whether stereotypes in higher distance education depend on the student group, and c) how the Big Two and subordinate facets predict intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions in higher distance education. An online survey with N = 626 students (74% female) of a large distance university showed that a measurement model with four facets (i.e., friendliness, morality, ability, conscientiousness) reveals adequate model fit for 12 student groups. Perceived stereotypes were positive for female students, older students, and students with children. However, migrant as well as younger students were perceived negatively. Across groups, stereotype content facets predicted intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions of facilitation or harm. Implications for the influence of negative stereotypes in higher distance education are discussed.},

keywords = {Emotion, stereotypes},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2021b,

title = {Group-specific Contact and Sense of Connectedness During the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Associations with Psychological Well-being, Perceived Stress, and Work-Life Balance},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann},

doi = {10.1002/casp.2564 },

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-01},

urldate = {2022-07-01},

journal = {Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology},

abstract = {Theories of social cure, sense of community, and social identity suggest that feelings of connectedness affect how we have coped with the COVID-19 pandemic. Although people can feel connected to a variety of different groups, such as their family, friends, co-workers, neighbours, nation, or all humanity, previous research has focused on connectedness to only a subset of these groups. To examine the relative importance of connectedness to and contact with specific groups for well-being, stress, and work-life balance during the pandemic, we conducted a longitudinal experience sampling study (N = 578) during the first 8 weeks of the Spring 2020 COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. Feeling connected to family members most strongly predicted psychological well-being (positively) and perceived stress (negatively) during the lockdown, followed by a sense of connectedness with friends and neighbours. Sense of connectedness to other groups did not predict well-being, stress, or work-life balance when controlling for the respective other groups. Hence, it not only matters whether or not a person feels connected to a group but also to which specific group he or she feels connected.},

keywords = {connectedness, contact between groups, sense of community, social identity, stress, well-being},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{article,

title = {When loneliness dimensions drift apart: Emotional, social and physical loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown and its associations with age, personality, stress, and well-being},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann},

doi = {10.1002/ijop.12772},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-01-01},

urldate = {2022-01-01},

journal = {International Journal of Psychology},

abstract = {Previous research differentiated between emotional loneliness (perceived lack of emotional connection with others) and social loneliness (perceived lack of a broader social network). We argue that physical loneliness (perceived lack of physical contact) constitutes a third dimension of loneliness that is particularly relevant in times of physical distancing. We conducted a longitudinal experience sampling study (N = 578) during the first eight weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany to test this claim. The results indicate that loneliness has a three-dimensional structure encompassing emotional, social and physical loneliness. Each loneliness dimension explained unique variance in perceived stress and psychological well-being. However, the three loneliness dimensions differed in their prevalence during the contact restrictions and their associations with age and personality. Physical loneliness was higher during the contact restrictions whereas emotional and social loneliness remained on a normal level. Age was positively associated with social loneliness but negatively associated with physical loneliness. Extraversion was negatively associated with emotional and social loneliness but positively associated with physical loneliness. These findings expand loneliness models, enhance loneliness assessment and improve the prediction of vulnerability to loneliness.},

keywords = {Covid-19, loneliness, stress, well-being},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {No matter how you mark the points on the fever curve – threatening shapes do not add to threat of climate change},

author = {Mariam Katsarava and Helen Landmann and Robert Gaschler},

doi = {10.1007/s12144-021-02553-2},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-12-04},

urldate = {2022-12-04},

journal = {Current Psychology},

abstract = {Graphs have become an increasingly important means of representing data, for instance, when communicating data on climate change. However, graph characteristics might significantly affect graph comprehension. The goal of the present work was to test whether the marking forms usually depicted on line-graphs, can have an impact on graph evaluation. As past work suggests that triangular forms might be related to threat, we compared the effect of triangular marking forms with other symbols (triangles, circles, squares, rhombi, and asterisks) on subjective assessments. Participants in Study 1 (N = 314) received 5 different line-graphs about climate change, each of them using one out of 5 marking forms. In Study 1, the threat and arousal ratings of the graphs with triangular marking shapes were not higher than those with the other marking symbols. Participants in Study 2 (N = 279) received the same graphs, yet without labels and indeed rated the graphs with triangle point markers as more threatening. Testing whether local rather than global spatial attention would lead to an impact of marker shape in climate graphs, Study 3 (N = 307) documented that a task demanding to process a specific data-point on the graph (rather than just the line graph as a whole) did not lead to an effect either. These results suggest that marking symbols can principally affect threat and arousal ratings but not in the context of climate change. Hence, in graphs on climate change, choice of point markers does not have to take potential side-effects on threat and arousal into account. These seem to be restricted to the processing of graphs where form aspects face less competition from the content domain on judgments.},

keywords = {perception, pro-environmental behavior},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2021,

title = {The bright and dark Side of eudaimonic emotions: A conceptual framework},

author = {Helen Landmann},

doi = {10.17645/mac.v9i2.3825},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-04-30},

journal = {Media and Communication},

volume = {9},

number = {2},

abstract = {Based on a review of eudaimonic emotion concepts, definitional and empirical overlaps between the concepts are identified and a framework of eudaimonic emotions is developed. The framework proposes that feelings of elevation, awe, tenderness, and being moved can be differentiated based on their feeling components, thus constituting the feeling-specific types of eudaimonic emotions. A variety of other emotion concepts rely on reference to their elicitors, such as moral elevation (i.e., being moved by moral virtue), aesthetic awe (i.e., being moved by beauty), kama muta (i.e., being moved by communal sharing) and admiration (i.e., being moved by achievements), thus constituting elicitor-specific types of eudaimonic emotions. Structuring eudaimonic emotions along these lines allows for integrating research on these emotions. This integration leads to the proposition of general eudaimonic effects and value-specific effects of positive eudaimonic emotions on behaviour. Considering these effects can enhance understanding of how positive eudaimonic emotions affect pro-social intentions—the bright side of being moved—as well as the manipulating effects of propaganda—the dark side of being moved.},

keywords = {admiration, appreciation, awe, being moved, elevation, Emotion, media, propaganda, radicalization, tenderness},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2020being,

title = {Being moved by protest: Collective efficacy beliefs and injustice appraisals enhance collective action intentions for forest protection via positive and negative emotions},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann},

doi = {10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101491},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-12-02},

urldate = {2020-12-02},

journal = {Journal of Environmental Psychology},

volume = {71},

pages = {101491},

publisher = {Elsevier},

abstract = {Based on collective action theories and appraisal theories of emotion, we propose that people are moved and positively overwhelmed by the idea that together they can make a difference for a more sustainable future and that these feelings motivate them to participate in pro-environmental collective action. We surveyed activists and sympathizers of a forest protection campaign (Study 1, N = 210) and conducted an experiment (Study 2, N = 221) to test this claim. As expected, feelings of being moved mediated the effect of collective efficacy beliefs on collective action intentions in both studies. Hence, being moved constitutes a second emotional path to collective action alongside group-based anger. These two emotional paths differently elicited the goal to punish authorities (intergroup goal), to be part of the movement (intragroup goal), and to reduce climate change (ideological goal). The findings suggest that negative and positive emotions (anger and being moved) amplify already existing motivations.},

keywords = {anger, being moved, collective action, Emotion, pro-environmental behavior, Punishment},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2020bb,

title = {Emotions in the context of environmental protection: Theoretical considerations concerning emotion types, eliciting processes, and affect generalization},

author = {Helen Landmann},

url = {http://umps.de/php/artikeldetails.php?id=745



http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Landmann-2020-Emotions-and-Environment.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-12-01},

urldate = {2020-12-01},

journal = {Umweltpsychologie},

volume = {24},

number = {2},

pages = {61-73},

abstract = {Emotions seem to be significant for pro-environmental behavior. Yet, questions about the differentiation, elicitation, and effects of emotions in the context of environmental protection remain. Specifically, current typologies of environmentally relevant emotions each cover only a subset of the relevant emotions. Furthermore, central environmental-psychological constructs such as emotional affinity towards nature are not explained well by current appraisal and emotion theories. Finally, the causal effects of emotions on pro-environmental behavioral intentions in experiments are rather weak and diminish over time, which conflicts with strong correlations between emotions and environmentally relevant intentions. The current work addresses these issues by (1) synthesizing types of environmentally relevant emotions, (2) differentiating paths to emotional reactions towards nature, and (3) considering the process of affect generalization for the consequences of emotion for environmentally relevant behavior. Partitioning affect along these dimensions helps capturing the broad range of environmentally relevant emotions, understanding how these emotions are elicited, and when they affect pro-environmental behavior.

},

keywords = {affect generalization, appraisal theory, Emotion, emotional affinity towards nature, pro-environmental behavior},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{klockequeer,

title = {Queer Meets Islam: Begegnung als Zumutung und Chance},

author = {Ulrich Klocke and Helen Landmann and Bernhard Heider},

url = {http://www.gemeindepsychologie.de/186.ht



http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Klocke-Landmann-Heider-2020-Queer-meets-Islam.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-11-01},

urldate = {2020-11-01},

journal = {Forum Gemeindepsychologie},

volume = {25},

number = {1},

abstract = {People of Muslim faith and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans* (LGBT) people are subject to prejudice and discrimination. Moreover, the relationship between the two groups is not always easy. We have therefore initiated and accompanied encounters between Muslims and LGBT. In this article we reflect on the scientific background of these encounters and give practical advice on how to organize them.



},

keywords = {contact between groups, discrimination, prejudice, values},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2020c,

title = {„Wir sind hier, wir sind laut, weil ihr uns die Zukunft klaut!“ – Warum engagieren sich Menschen gemeinsam für den Umweltschutz?},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann},

url = {https://de.in-mind.org/article/wir-sind-hier-wir-sind-laut-weil-ihr-uns-die-zukunft-klaut-warum-engagieren-sich-menschen



http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Landmann-Rohmann-2020-Umweltaktivismus.pdf

},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-05-01},

urldate = {2020-05-01},

journal = {The Inquisitive Mind},

volume = {2/20},

abstract = {„Warum sollen wir auf eine Zukunft bauen, die bald nicht mehr existieren wird?“ Als Antwort auf diese Frage streiken SchülerInnen mittlerweile weltweit gemeinsam für eine wirkungsvolle Klimapolitik. Sie gehen regelmäßig gemeinsam auf die Straße und nehmen dabei auch in Kauf, Schulstoff nachzuarbeiten. Was bringt sie dazu, trotz möglicher Nachteile und Zeitaufwand weiterhin an den Protesten teilzunehmen? Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die psychologische Forschung zur Erklärung kollektiven Handelns für den Klimaschutz und zeigt auf, wie diese Prozesse für aktuelle Bewegungen relevant sind.

},

keywords = {anger, being moved, collective action, pro-environmental behavior, social identity},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Jaeger-Erben2020,

title = {Ist das noch gut oder kann das weg? Die Umweltpsychologie erklärt den Wegwerftrend},

author = {Melanie Jaeger-Erben and Helen Landmann},

url = {https://de.in-mind.org/article/ist-das-noch-gut-oder-kann-das-weg-die-umweltpsychologie-erklaert-den-wegwerftrend



http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Jaeger-Erben-Landmann-2020-Wegwerftrend.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-05-01},

urldate = {2020-05-01},

journal = {The Inquisitive Mind},

volume = {2/20},

abstract = {JedeR Deutsche erzeugt pro Jahr 22,8 kg Elektroschrott, damit liegt Deutschland laut dem Global E-Waste-Monitor von 2017 weltweit an der Spitze. Viele Geräte werden ausgetauscht, obwohl sie noch funktionieren oder leicht repariert werden könnten. Entscheidend für die Lebensdauer von Gebrauchsgegenständen ist oft der Mensch, seine Erwartungen, sein Wissen und seine Kompetenzen.

},

keywords = {Emotion, pro-environmental behavior},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2019threatening,

title = {What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration},

author = {Helen Landmann and Robert Gaschler and Anette Rohmann},

doi = {10.1002/ejsp.2593},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

urldate = {2019-01-01},

journal = {European Journal of Social Psychology},

volume = {49},

number = {7},

pages = {1401--1420},

publisher = {Wiley Online Library},

abstract = {Threat is one of the most important predictors for attitudes towards refugees and migration. The current research addresses the role of different threat types and emotional reactions in the context of refugee migration with a multi‐method approach. Using qualitative (Study 1, N = 202) and quantitative (Studies 2–4, N = 873) methods, we identified six types of threat that majority group members in Germany experience in the face of refugee migration: Concerns about cultural differences (symbolic threat), financial strain (realistic threat), criminal acts (safety threat), conflicts within society (cohesion threat), increasing xenophobia (prejudice threat), and refugee care (altruistic threat). All these threat types elicited negative emotions and were associated with negative attitudes towards refugees and support for restrictive migration policies. Paradoxically, concerns about refugee care predicted support for restrictive migration policies particularly well (altruistic threat paradox), which can be explained by a lack of emotional responses to this type of threat. Based on these findings, we propose a bidirectional model of intergroup threat.},

keywords = {contact between groups, Emotion, intergroup threat, prejudice, refugee migration},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2019being,

title = {Being moved by meaningfulness: Appraisals of surpassing internal standards elicit being moved by relationships and achievements},

author = {Helen Landmann and Florian Cova and Ursula Hess},

doi = {10.1080/02699931.2019.1567463},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

urldate = {2019-01-01},

journal = {Cognition and Emotion},

volume = {33},

number = {7},

pages = {1387-1409},

publisher = {Taylor & Francis},

abstract = {People can be moved and overwhelmed, a phenomenon typically accompanied by goose-bumps and tears. We argue that these feelings of being moved are not limited to situations that are appraised as pro-social but elicited when someone surpasses an internal standard. In line with these predictions, people were moved by relationships and success (Study 1), by reunion, separation, success and failure (Study 2) and by social, environmental and sports achievements (Study 3). In all three studies, the elicitation of these feelings was partially mediated by appraisals of surpassing social or achievement standards. In line with this, ratings of meaningfulness were closely associated with feelings of being moved and moving stimuli elicited behavioural intentions such as spending time with family and friends, helping others and/or achieving something in life. Thus, moving situations may remind us about what we perceive as meaningful and thereby help us to act accordingly.},

keywords = {appraisal theory, awe, being moved, chills, elevation, pro-environmental behavior, values},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2018testing,

title = {Testing moral foundation theory: Are specific moral emotions elicited by specific moral transgressions?},

author = {Helen Landmann and Ursula Hess},

doi = {10.1080/03057240.2017.1350569},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Moral Education},

volume = {47},

number = {1},

pages = {34--47},

publisher = {Taylor & Francis},

abstract = {Moral foundation theory posits that specific moral transgressions elicit specific moral emotions. To test this claim, participants (N = 195) were asked to rate their emotions in response to moral violation vignettes. We found that compassion and disgust were associated with care and purity respectively as predicted by moral foundation theory. However, anger, rage, contempt, resentment and fear were not associated to any single moral transgression. Thus, even though the type of moral violation matters for the type of emotion that is elicited, the link between moral foundations and moral emotions seems more complex than moral foundation theory suggests. Rather, the findings suggest that there are both emotion-specific foundations (i.e. care and purity) and emotion-unspecific foundations (i.e. fairness, authority and loyalty).},

keywords = {anger, compassion, contempt, disgust, Emotion, moral decisions, Moral foundation theory},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{hess2018bidirectional,

title = {The bidirectional relation of emotion perception and social judgments: the effect of witness’ emotion expression on perceptions of moral behaviour and vice versa},

author = {Ursula Hess and Helen Landmann and Shlomo David and Shlomo Hareli},

doi = {10.1080/02699931.2017.1388769},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-01-01},

urldate = {2018-01-01},

journal = {Cognition and Emotion},

volume = {32},

number = {6},

pages = {1152--1165},

publisher = {Taylor & Francis},

abstract = {The present research tested the notion that emotion expression and context perception are bidirectionally related. Specifically, in two studies focusing on moral violations (N = 288) and positive moral deviations (N = 245) respectively, we presented participants with short vignettes describing behaviours that were either (im)moral, (in)polite or unusual together with a picture of the emotional reaction of a person who supposedly had been a witness to the event. Participants rated both the emotional reactions observed and their own moral appraisal of the situation described. In both studies, we found that situational context influenced how emotional reactions to this context were rated and in turn, the emotional expression shown in reaction to a situation influenced the appraisal of the situation. That is, neither the moral events nor the emotion expressions were judged in an absolute fashion. Rather, the perception of one also depended on the other.},

keywords = {anger, awe, contempt, context, disgust, Emotion, joy, moral decisions},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2017elicitsb,

title = {What elicits third-party anger? The effects of moral violation and others’ outcome on anger and compassion},

author = {Helen Landmann and Ursula Hess},

doi = {10.1080/02699931.2016.1194258},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-06-01},

urldate = {2017-06-01},

journal = {Cognition and Emotion},

volume = {31},

number = {6},

pages = {1097--1111},

publisher = {Taylor & Francis},

abstract = {People often get angry when they perceive an injustice that affects others but not themselves. In two studies, we investigated the elicitation of third-party anger by varying moral violation and others’ outcome presented in newspaper articles. We found that anger was highly contingent on the moral violation. Others’ outcome, although relevant for compassion, were not significantly relevant for anger (Study 1 and Study 2a) or less relevant for anger than for compassion (Study 2b). This indicates that people can be morally outraged: anger can be elicited by a perceived violation of moral values alone, independent of the harm done. A severe negative consequence for others is not necessary to elicit anger.},

keywords = {anger, appraisal theory, compassion, cooperation, Economic Decisions, Emotion, Punishment},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2017d,

title = {Sozialpsychologie und Flucht},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann and Stefan Stürmer},

url = {https://www.wissenschaft-und-frieden.de/seite.php?artikelID=2202

},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-02-01},

urldate = {2017-02-01},

journal = {Wissenschaft & Frieden},

volume = {2017-2},

abstract = {Migration durch Flucht birgt Konfliktpotential. Als 2015 die Anzahl der Menschen, die nach Deutschland fliehen, plötzlich anstieg, verfünffachte sich die Anzahl der Angriffe auf Flüchtlingsunterkünfte zeitweise (Bundeskriminalamt 2016). Sozialpsychologische Forschung kann einen Beitrag leisten, um solche Konflikte zu vermeiden und ein friedliches Zusammenleben zwischen Menschen mit und ohne Fluchterfahrung zu fördern. Die Autor*innen beleuchten daher, welche Implikationen aus sozialpsychologischer Forschung abgeleitet werden können. Grundlage dafür bietet der Sammelband »Die Flüchtlingsdebatte in Deutschland – Sozialpsychologische Perspektiven« (2017), herausgegeben von Anette Rohmann und Stefan Stürmer.},

keywords = {contact between groups, Emotion, intergroup threat, Political Decisions, refugee migration},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2017kontakthypothese,

title = {Die Kontakthypothese: Wie Kontakt Vorurteile reduzieren und die Integration Geflüchteter fördern kann},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anna Lisa Aydin and Rolf van Dick and Ulrich Klocke},

url = {https://de.in-mind.org/article/die-kontakthypothese-wie-kontakt-vorurteile-reduzieren-und-die-integration-gefluechteter

http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Landmann-et-al-2017-Kontakthypothese-Druck.pdf},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

journal = {The Inquisitive Mind},

volume = {3},

abstract = {Im Zuge der Flüchtlingsbewegungen taucht immer wieder die Frage auf, wie man eine Willkommenskultur in Deutschland aufbauen und erhalten kann. Die sozialpsychologische Forschung legt nahe, dass eine vergleichsweise einfache Maßnahme - Kontakt – die Einstellung gegenüber Geflüchteten positiv beeinflusst. Wir fassen die Forschung zu dieser These – der Kontakthypothese – zusammen und zeigen auf, wie die Ergebnisse für den Umgang mit Geflüchteten genutzt werden könnten.

},

keywords = {contact between groups, prejudice, refugee migration},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Aydin2017,

title = {Fremder oder Freund? Unter welchen Umständen sich der Kontakt zwischen Deutschen und Geflüchteten positiv auf das Zusammenleben auswirken kann},

author = {Anna Lisa Aydin and Helen Landmann and Ulrich Klocke and Rolf van Dick},

url = {http://de.in-mind.org/article/fremder-oder-freund-unter-welchen-umstaenden-sich-der-kontakt-zwischen-deutschen-und



http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Aydin-et-al-2017-Kontakthypothese.pdf},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

journal = {The Inquisitive Mind},

volume = {3/17},

abstract = {Die sozialpsychologische Forschung legt nahe, dass die Migration von mehr Menschen nach Deutschland mittel- und längerfristig dazu führen kann, die Vorurteile der deutschen Mehrheitsbevölkerung zu reduzieren. Die aktuelle Flüchtlingssituation in Deutschland kann daher eine Chance sein, bisher fremde Kulturen und Religionen besser zu verstehen. Wichtig dafür ist allerdings, dass es zwischen den unterschiedlichen Gruppen nicht nur zu oberflächlichen Kontakten, sondern zu Freundschaften kommt. Gelingt dies, sehen wir Chancen sowohl für die deutsche Mehrheitsgesellschaft als auch für diejenigen, die zu uns kommen.

},

keywords = {contact between groups, prejudice, refugee migration},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}