2024
Rogmann, Jennifer; Beckmann, Joscha; Gaschler, Robert; Landmann, Helen
Media sentiment emotions and consumer energy prices Journal Article
In: Energy Economics, 2024.
Links | Tags: Emotion, Environment
@article{Rogmann2024,
title = {Media sentiment emotions and consumer energy prices},
author = {Jennifer Rogmann and Joscha Beckmann and Robert Gaschler and Helen Landmann},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107278},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-02-01},
journal = {Energy Economics},
keywords = {Emotion, Environment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2023
Barbett, Lea; Landmann, Helen
What is pro-environmental behaviour? Towards nuanced maps of multi-dimensional pro-environmental behaviours that highlight the relevance of impact and diversity Journal Article Forthcoming
In: Umweltpsychologie, Forthcoming.
Tags: diversity, Environment
@article{Barbett0000,
title = {What is pro-environmental behaviour? Towards nuanced maps of multi-dimensional pro-environmental behaviours that highlight the relevance of impact and diversity},
author = {Lea Barbett and Helen Landmann},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-07-11},
journal = {Umweltpsychologie},
keywords = {diversity, Environment},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Landmann, Helen; Kachel, Sven; Kommerscheidt, Laura; Lange, Florian; Richter, Isabel
Assessing Diversity Dimensions in Environmental Psychology: Challenges and Recommendations Journal Article
In: Umweltpsychologie, 2023.
Links | Tags: diversity, Environment
@article{nokey,
title = {Assessing Diversity Dimensions in Environmental Psychology: Challenges and Recommendations},
author = {Helen Landmann and Sven Kachel and Laura Kommerscheidt and Florian Lange and Isabel Richter},
url = {http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Landmann_Kachel_Kommerscheidt_Lange_Richter_2023_Assessing_Diversity_Dimensions.pdf},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-05-31},
urldate = {2023-05-31},
journal = {Umweltpsychologie},
keywords = {diversity, Environment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2021
Katsarava, Mariam; Landmann, Helen; Gaschler, Robert
No matter how you mark the points on the fever curve – threatening shapes do not add to threat of climate change Journal Article
In: Current Psychology, 2021.
Abstract | Links | Tags: Environment
@article{nokey,
title = {No matter how you mark the points on the fever curve – threatening shapes do not add to threat of climate change},
author = {Mariam Katsarava and Helen Landmann and Robert Gaschler},
doi = {10.1007/s12144-021-02553-2},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-12-04},
urldate = {2021-12-04},
journal = {Current Psychology},
abstract = {Graphs have become an increasingly important means of representing data, for instance, when communicating data on climate change. However, graph characteristics might significantly affect graph comprehension. The goal of the present work was to test whether the marking forms usually depicted on line-graphs, can have an impact on graph evaluation. As past work suggests that triangular forms might be related to threat, we compared the effect of triangular marking forms with other symbols (triangles, circles, squares, rhombi, and asterisks) on subjective assessments. Participants in Study 1 (N = 314) received 5 different line-graphs about climate change, each of them using one out of 5 marking forms. In Study 1, the threat and arousal ratings of the graphs with triangular marking shapes were not higher than those with the other marking symbols. Participants in Study 2 (N = 279) received the same graphs, yet without labels and indeed rated the graphs with triangle point markers as more threatening. Testing whether local rather than global spatial attention would lead to an impact of marker shape in climate graphs, Study 3 (N = 307) documented that a task demanding to process a specific data-point on the graph (rather than just the line graph as a whole) did not lead to an effect either. These results suggest that marking symbols can principally affect threat and arousal ratings but not in the context of climate change. Hence, in graphs on climate change, choice of point markers does not have to take potential side-effects on threat and arousal into account. These seem to be restricted to the processing of graphs where form aspects face less competition from the content domain on judgments.},
keywords = {Environment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Seger, Benedikt; Wullenkord, Marlis; Hamann, Karin; Chokrai, Parissa; Landmann, Helen
Psychologie des sozial-ökologischen Wandels: eine offene virtuelle Vorlesung Book Section
In: F. Peter L. Dohm, & K. van Bronswijk (Ed.): „Climate Action" – Handlungshemmnisse und Handlungsmöglichkeiten in der Klimakrise, Psychosozial Verlag, 2021.
Abstract | Links | Tags: collective action, context, Environment
@incollection{Seger2021,
title = {Psychologie des sozial-ökologischen Wandels: eine offene virtuelle Vorlesung},
author = {Benedikt Seger and Marlis Wullenkord and Karin Hamann and Parissa Chokrai and Helen Landmann},
editor = {L. Dohm, F. Peter, & K. van Bronswijk},
url = {http://www.psychosozial-verlag.de/download/Psychologie_des_sozialoekologischen_Wandels.pdf},
doi = {10.30820/9783837978018},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
urldate = {2021-01-01},
booktitle = { „Climate Action" – Handlungshemmnisse und Handlungsmöglichkeiten in der Klimakrise},
publisher = {Psychosozial Verlag},
abstract = {Immer deutlicher zeichnet sich ab, dass wir die ökologischen und sozialen Herausforderungen unseres Jahrhunderts nicht allein durch technischen Fortschritt lösen können, sondern einen umfangreichen
Wandel unseres gesellschaftlichen Zusammenlebens brauchen. Die Psychologie als Wissenschaft individuellen Erlebens, Denkens und Verhaltens spielt deshalb eine wichtige Rolle für den sozial-ökologischen Wandel. Um dafür möglichst viele wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse aus der Psychologie für Studierende, Akteur*innen des Wandels und eine breite Öffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen, entstand aus der Initiative Psychologie im Umweltschutz (IPU) in Zusammenarbeit mit renommierten Wissenschaftler*innen eine offene virtuelle Vorlesungsreihe nach dem Prinzip der offenen Bildungsmaterialien (Open Educational Resources). Die zehn Vorlesungseinheiten umfassen Konzepte
und Modelle zu sozial-ökologischem Wandel, Mensch-Umwelt-Interaktionen, Einflussfaktoren auf individuelles und kollektives Umweltverhalten und Ideen des Guten Lebens in sozial-ökologisch nachhaltigen Gesellschaften. In diesem Beitrag werden die Inhalte der Vorlesungsreihe zusammengefasst. Sie zeigen Ansatzpunkte auf, wie sich die Psychologie in eine interdisziplinäre Nachhaltigkeitsforschung
einbetten lässt und wie sich Menschen mithilfe der Psychologie für einen sozial-ökologischen Wandel einsetzen können.},
keywords = {collective action, context, Environment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}
Wandel unseres gesellschaftlichen Zusammenlebens brauchen. Die Psychologie als Wissenschaft individuellen Erlebens, Denkens und Verhaltens spielt deshalb eine wichtige Rolle für den sozial-ökologischen Wandel. Um dafür möglichst viele wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse aus der Psychologie für Studierende, Akteur*innen des Wandels und eine breite Öffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen, entstand aus der Initiative Psychologie im Umweltschutz (IPU) in Zusammenarbeit mit renommierten Wissenschaftler*innen eine offene virtuelle Vorlesungsreihe nach dem Prinzip der offenen Bildungsmaterialien (Open Educational Resources). Die zehn Vorlesungseinheiten umfassen Konzepte
und Modelle zu sozial-ökologischem Wandel, Mensch-Umwelt-Interaktionen, Einflussfaktoren auf individuelles und kollektives Umweltverhalten und Ideen des Guten Lebens in sozial-ökologisch nachhaltigen Gesellschaften. In diesem Beitrag werden die Inhalte der Vorlesungsreihe zusammengefasst. Sie zeigen Ansatzpunkte auf, wie sich die Psychologie in eine interdisziplinäre Nachhaltigkeitsforschung
einbetten lässt und wie sich Menschen mithilfe der Psychologie für einen sozial-ökologischen Wandel einsetzen können.
2020
Landmann, Helen; Rohmann, Anette
In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 71, pp. 101491, 2020.
Abstract | Links | Tags: being moved, collective action, Emotion, Environment
@article{landmann2020being,
title = {Being moved by protest: Collective efficacy beliefs and injustice appraisals enhance collective action intentions for forest protection via positive and negative emotions},
author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann},
doi = {10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101491},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-12-02},
urldate = {2020-12-02},
journal = {Journal of Environmental Psychology},
volume = {71},
pages = {101491},
publisher = {Elsevier},
abstract = {Based on collective action theories and appraisal theories of emotion, we propose that people are moved and positively overwhelmed by the idea that together they can make a difference for a more sustainable future and that these feelings motivate them to participate in pro-environmental collective action. We surveyed activists and sympathizers of a forest protection campaign (Study 1, N = 210) and conducted an experiment (Study 2, N = 221) to test this claim. As expected, feelings of being moved mediated the effect of collective efficacy beliefs on collective action intentions in both studies. Hence, being moved constitutes a second emotional path to collective action alongside group-based anger. These two emotional paths differently elicited the goal to punish authorities (intergroup goal), to be part of the movement (intragroup goal), and to reduce climate change (ideological goal). The findings suggest that negative and positive emotions (anger and being moved) amplify already existing motivations.},
keywords = {being moved, collective action, Emotion, Environment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Landmann, Helen
In: Umweltpsychologie, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 61-73, 2020.
Abstract | Links | Tags: Emotion, Environment
@article{Landmann2020bb,
title = {Emotions in the context of environmental protection: Theoretical considerations concerning emotion types, eliciting processes, and affect generalization},
author = {Helen Landmann},
url = {http://umps.de/php/artikeldetails.php?id=745
http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Landmann-2020-Emotions-and-Environment.pdf},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-12-01},
urldate = {2020-12-01},
journal = {Umweltpsychologie},
volume = {24},
number = {2},
pages = {61-73},
abstract = {Emotions seem to be significant for pro-environmental behavior. Yet, questions about the differentiation, elicitation, and effects of emotions in the context of environmental protection remain. Specifically, current typologies of environmentally relevant emotions each cover only a subset of the relevant emotions. Furthermore, central environmental-psychological constructs such as emotional affinity towards nature are not explained well by current appraisal and emotion theories. Finally, the causal effects of emotions on pro-environmental behavioral intentions in experiments are rather weak and diminish over time, which conflicts with strong correlations between emotions and environmentally relevant intentions. The current work addresses these issues by (1) synthesizing types of environmentally relevant emotions, (2) differentiating paths to emotional reactions towards nature, and (3) considering the process of affect generalization for the consequences of emotion for environmentally relevant behavior. Partitioning affect along these dimensions helps capturing the broad range of environmentally relevant emotions, understanding how these emotions are elicited, and when they affect pro-environmental behavior.
},
keywords = {Emotion, Environment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Jaeger-Erben, Melanie; Landmann, Helen
Ist das noch gut oder kann das weg? Die Umweltpsychologie erklärt den Wegwerftrend Journal Article
In: The Inquisitive Mind, vol. 2/20, 2020.
Abstract | Links | Tags: Emotion, Environment
@article{Jaeger-Erben2020,
title = {Ist das noch gut oder kann das weg? Die Umweltpsychologie erklärt den Wegwerftrend},
author = {Melanie Jaeger-Erben and Helen Landmann},
url = {https://de.in-mind.org/article/ist-das-noch-gut-oder-kann-das-weg-die-umweltpsychologie-erklaert-den-wegwerftrend
http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Jaeger-Erben-Landmann-2020-Wegwerftrend.pdf},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-05-01},
urldate = {2020-05-01},
journal = {The Inquisitive Mind},
volume = {2/20},
abstract = {JedeR Deutsche erzeugt pro Jahr 22,8 kg Elektroschrott, damit liegt Deutschland laut dem Global E-Waste-Monitor von 2017 weltweit an der Spitze. Viele Geräte werden ausgetauscht, obwohl sie noch funktionieren oder leicht repariert werden könnten. Entscheidend für die Lebensdauer von Gebrauchsgegenständen ist oft der Mensch, seine Erwartungen, sein Wissen und seine Kompetenzen.
},
keywords = {Emotion, Environment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}