Dr. Helen Landmann

@article{Bick0000,

title = {Social Evaluation at a Distance - Facets of Stereotype Content about Student Groups in Higher Distance Education},

author = {Nathalie Bick and Laura Fröhlich and Marie-Therese Friehs and Patrick Kotzur and Helen Landmann},

doi = {https://osf.io/mjf5n/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-01},

urldate = {2022-09-01},

journal = {International Review of Social Psychology},

volume = {53},

issue = {1},

abstract = {In the academic domain, belonging to a negatively stereotyped group can impair performance and peer relationships. In higher distance education, stereotypes may be particularly influential as face-to-face contact is limited and non-traditional students who are at risk of being stereotyped are overrepresented. Still, research on stereotypes in higher distance education is sparse. The current research addresses this gap by investigating the Big Two of social perception (warmth, competence) and subordinate facets (friendliness, morality, assertiveness, ability, conscientiousness) in the context of higher distance education. It tests a) how well models with warmth/competence or the facets fit the data, b) whether stereotypes in higher distance education depend on the student group, and c) how the Big Two and subordinate facets predict intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions in higher distance education. An online survey with N = 626 students (74% female) of a large distance university showed that a measurement model with four facets (i.e., friendliness, morality, ability, conscientiousness) reveals adequate model fit for 12 student groups. Perceived stereotypes were positive for female students, older students, and students with children. However, migrant as well as younger students were perceived negatively. Across groups, stereotype content facets predicted intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions of facilitation or harm. Implications for the influence of negative stereotypes in higher distance education are discussed.},

keywords = {Emotion, stereotypes},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2021,

title = {The bright and dark Side of eudaimonic emotions: A conceptual framework},

author = {Helen Landmann},

doi = {10.17645/mac.v9i2.3825},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-04-30},

journal = {Media and Communication},

volume = {9},

number = {2},

abstract = {Based on a review of eudaimonic emotion concepts, definitional and empirical overlaps between the concepts are identified and a framework of eudaimonic emotions is developed. The framework proposes that feelings of elevation, awe, tenderness, and being moved can be differentiated based on their feeling components, thus constituting the feeling-specific types of eudaimonic emotions. A variety of other emotion concepts rely on reference to their elicitors, such as moral elevation (i.e., being moved by moral virtue), aesthetic awe (i.e., being moved by beauty), kama muta (i.e., being moved by communal sharing) and admiration (i.e., being moved by achievements), thus constituting elicitor-specific types of eudaimonic emotions. Structuring eudaimonic emotions along these lines allows for integrating research on these emotions. This integration leads to the proposition of general eudaimonic effects and value-specific effects of positive eudaimonic emotions on behaviour. Considering these effects can enhance understanding of how positive eudaimonic emotions affect pro-social intentions—the bright side of being moved—as well as the manipulating effects of propaganda—the dark side of being moved.},

keywords = {admiration, appreciation, awe, being moved, elevation, Emotion, media, propaganda, radicalization, tenderness},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2020being,

title = {Being moved by protest: Collective efficacy beliefs and injustice appraisals enhance collective action intentions for forest protection via positive and negative emotions},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann},

doi = {10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101491},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-12-02},

urldate = {2020-12-02},

journal = {Journal of Environmental Psychology},

volume = {71},

pages = {101491},

publisher = {Elsevier},

abstract = {Based on collective action theories and appraisal theories of emotion, we propose that people are moved and positively overwhelmed by the idea that together they can make a difference for a more sustainable future and that these feelings motivate them to participate in pro-environmental collective action. We surveyed activists and sympathizers of a forest protection campaign (Study 1, N = 210) and conducted an experiment (Study 2, N = 221) to test this claim. As expected, feelings of being moved mediated the effect of collective efficacy beliefs on collective action intentions in both studies. Hence, being moved constitutes a second emotional path to collective action alongside group-based anger. These two emotional paths differently elicited the goal to punish authorities (intergroup goal), to be part of the movement (intragroup goal), and to reduce climate change (ideological goal). The findings suggest that negative and positive emotions (anger and being moved) amplify already existing motivations.},

keywords = {anger, being moved, collective action, Emotion, pro-environmental behavior, Punishment},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2020bb,

title = {Emotions in the context of environmental protection: Theoretical considerations concerning emotion types, eliciting processes, and affect generalization},

author = {Helen Landmann},

url = {http://umps.de/php/artikeldetails.php?id=745



http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Landmann-2020-Emotions-and-Environment.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-12-01},

urldate = {2020-12-01},

journal = {Umweltpsychologie},

volume = {24},

number = {2},

pages = {61-73},

abstract = {Emotions seem to be significant for pro-environmental behavior. Yet, questions about the differentiation, elicitation, and effects of emotions in the context of environmental protection remain. Specifically, current typologies of environmentally relevant emotions each cover only a subset of the relevant emotions. Furthermore, central environmental-psychological constructs such as emotional affinity towards nature are not explained well by current appraisal and emotion theories. Finally, the causal effects of emotions on pro-environmental behavioral intentions in experiments are rather weak and diminish over time, which conflicts with strong correlations between emotions and environmentally relevant intentions. The current work addresses these issues by (1) synthesizing types of environmentally relevant emotions, (2) differentiating paths to emotional reactions towards nature, and (3) considering the process of affect generalization for the consequences of emotion for environmentally relevant behavior. Partitioning affect along these dimensions helps capturing the broad range of environmentally relevant emotions, understanding how these emotions are elicited, and when they affect pro-environmental behavior.

},

keywords = {affect generalization, appraisal theory, Emotion, emotional affinity towards nature, pro-environmental behavior},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Jaeger-Erben2020,

title = {Ist das noch gut oder kann das weg? Die Umweltpsychologie erklärt den Wegwerftrend},

author = {Melanie Jaeger-Erben and Helen Landmann},

url = {https://de.in-mind.org/article/ist-das-noch-gut-oder-kann-das-weg-die-umweltpsychologie-erklaert-den-wegwerftrend



http://www.helen-landmann.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Jaeger-Erben-Landmann-2020-Wegwerftrend.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-05-01},

urldate = {2020-05-01},

journal = {The Inquisitive Mind},

volume = {2/20},

abstract = {JedeR Deutsche erzeugt pro Jahr 22,8 kg Elektroschrott, damit liegt Deutschland laut dem Global E-Waste-Monitor von 2017 weltweit an der Spitze. Viele Geräte werden ausgetauscht, obwohl sie noch funktionieren oder leicht repariert werden könnten. Entscheidend für die Lebensdauer von Gebrauchsgegenständen ist oft der Mensch, seine Erwartungen, sein Wissen und seine Kompetenzen.

},

keywords = {Emotion, pro-environmental behavior},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2019threatening,

title = {What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration},

author = {Helen Landmann and Robert Gaschler and Anette Rohmann},

doi = {10.1002/ejsp.2593},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

urldate = {2019-01-01},

journal = {European Journal of Social Psychology},

volume = {49},

number = {7},

pages = {1401--1420},

publisher = {Wiley Online Library},

abstract = {Threat is one of the most important predictors for attitudes towards refugees and migration. The current research addresses the role of different threat types and emotional reactions in the context of refugee migration with a multi‐method approach. Using qualitative (Study 1, N = 202) and quantitative (Studies 2–4, N = 873) methods, we identified six types of threat that majority group members in Germany experience in the face of refugee migration: Concerns about cultural differences (symbolic threat), financial strain (realistic threat), criminal acts (safety threat), conflicts within society (cohesion threat), increasing xenophobia (prejudice threat), and refugee care (altruistic threat). All these threat types elicited negative emotions and were associated with negative attitudes towards refugees and support for restrictive migration policies. Paradoxically, concerns about refugee care predicted support for restrictive migration policies particularly well (altruistic threat paradox), which can be explained by a lack of emotional responses to this type of threat. Based on these findings, we propose a bidirectional model of intergroup threat.},

keywords = {contact between groups, Emotion, intergroup threat, prejudice, refugee migration},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2018testing,

title = {Testing moral foundation theory: Are specific moral emotions elicited by specific moral transgressions?},

author = {Helen Landmann and Ursula Hess},

doi = {10.1080/03057240.2017.1350569},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Moral Education},

volume = {47},

number = {1},

pages = {34--47},

publisher = {Taylor & Francis},

abstract = {Moral foundation theory posits that specific moral transgressions elicit specific moral emotions. To test this claim, participants (N = 195) were asked to rate their emotions in response to moral violation vignettes. We found that compassion and disgust were associated with care and purity respectively as predicted by moral foundation theory. However, anger, rage, contempt, resentment and fear were not associated to any single moral transgression. Thus, even though the type of moral violation matters for the type of emotion that is elicited, the link between moral foundations and moral emotions seems more complex than moral foundation theory suggests. Rather, the findings suggest that there are both emotion-specific foundations (i.e. care and purity) and emotion-unspecific foundations (i.e. fairness, authority and loyalty).},

keywords = {anger, compassion, contempt, disgust, Emotion, moral decisions, Moral foundation theory},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{hess2018bidirectional,

title = {The bidirectional relation of emotion perception and social judgments: the effect of witness’ emotion expression on perceptions of moral behaviour and vice versa},

author = {Ursula Hess and Helen Landmann and Shlomo David and Shlomo Hareli},

doi = {10.1080/02699931.2017.1388769},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-01-01},

urldate = {2018-01-01},

journal = {Cognition and Emotion},

volume = {32},

number = {6},

pages = {1152--1165},

publisher = {Taylor & Francis},

abstract = {The present research tested the notion that emotion expression and context perception are bidirectionally related. Specifically, in two studies focusing on moral violations (N = 288) and positive moral deviations (N = 245) respectively, we presented participants with short vignettes describing behaviours that were either (im)moral, (in)polite or unusual together with a picture of the emotional reaction of a person who supposedly had been a witness to the event. Participants rated both the emotional reactions observed and their own moral appraisal of the situation described. In both studies, we found that situational context influenced how emotional reactions to this context were rated and in turn, the emotional expression shown in reaction to a situation influenced the appraisal of the situation. That is, neither the moral events nor the emotion expressions were judged in an absolute fashion. Rather, the perception of one also depended on the other.},

keywords = {anger, awe, contempt, context, disgust, Emotion, joy, moral decisions},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{landmann2017elicitsb,

title = {What elicits third-party anger? The effects of moral violation and others’ outcome on anger and compassion},

author = {Helen Landmann and Ursula Hess},

doi = {10.1080/02699931.2016.1194258},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-06-01},

urldate = {2017-06-01},

journal = {Cognition and Emotion},

volume = {31},

number = {6},

pages = {1097--1111},

publisher = {Taylor & Francis},

abstract = {People often get angry when they perceive an injustice that affects others but not themselves. In two studies, we investigated the elicitation of third-party anger by varying moral violation and others’ outcome presented in newspaper articles. We found that anger was highly contingent on the moral violation. Others’ outcome, although relevant for compassion, were not significantly relevant for anger (Study 1 and Study 2a) or less relevant for anger than for compassion (Study 2b). This indicates that people can be morally outraged: anger can be elicited by a perceived violation of moral values alone, independent of the harm done. A severe negative consequence for others is not necessary to elicit anger.},

keywords = {anger, appraisal theory, compassion, cooperation, Economic Decisions, Emotion, Punishment},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Landmann2017d,

title = {Sozialpsychologie und Flucht},

author = {Helen Landmann and Anette Rohmann and Stefan Stürmer},

url = {https://www.wissenschaft-und-frieden.de/seite.php?artikelID=2202

},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-02-01},

urldate = {2017-02-01},

journal = {Wissenschaft & Frieden},

volume = {2017-2},

abstract = {Migration durch Flucht birgt Konfliktpotential. Als 2015 die Anzahl der Menschen, die nach Deutschland fliehen, plötzlich anstieg, verfünffachte sich die Anzahl der Angriffe auf Flüchtlingsunterkünfte zeitweise (Bundeskriminalamt 2016). Sozialpsychologische Forschung kann einen Beitrag leisten, um solche Konflikte zu vermeiden und ein friedliches Zusammenleben zwischen Menschen mit und ohne Fluchterfahrung zu fördern. Die Autor*innen beleuchten daher, welche Implikationen aus sozialpsychologischer Forschung abgeleitet werden können. Grundlage dafür bietet der Sammelband »Die Flüchtlingsdebatte in Deutschland – Sozialpsychologische Perspektiven« (2017), herausgegeben von Anette Rohmann und Stefan Stürmer.},

keywords = {contact between groups, Emotion, intergroup threat, Political Decisions, refugee migration},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}